Media Sustainability Index

Producer: 

International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX)

Stated Purpose: 

Designed as a tool to measure media development, as well as to assess changes in media systems over time.

Area of Governance: 
Media
Funding Source: 

USAID

Designed as a tool to measure media development, as well as to assess changes in media systems over time.

Current usage: 

Used as an advocacy tool.

Type of data used: 

The results are based upon a combination of expert panel and IREX staff assessments against a pre-specified set of norms.

Coverage: 

The index covers 20 countries from Europe and Eurasia.

Time Coverage: 

First data: Collected in 2001.
Latest data: Collected in 2005.
Stated frequency: Not stated.

Contact details: 

2121 K Street NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20037
Tel: +1 (202) 628-8188
E-mail: irex@irex.org

Methodology: 

The index is compiled using a system which scores countries against a specified set of freedoms. The scores are averaged within each of the 5 aspects measured, namely:

  1. Free speech
  2. Professional journalism
  3. Plurality of news sources
  4. Business management
  5. Supporting institutions

An expert panel is drawn from representatives of local media, non-governmental organisations, professional associations, international donors and media development
implementers. The panel scores each aspect individually, then meets to agree on combined assessment. This is then averaged with an assessment from the IREX staff to obtain the final rating.

Format of results: 

0-4 range. 0 being lowest – defined as ‘country meets few indicators; government and society actively oppose change’. Scores of 3 and above are taken to be a  sustainable and free independent media.

Valid Use: 

The index and the country reports which accompany it can provide an interesting insight into the functioning of the free media in a broader sense than some other similar indices.

Invalid Use: 

This should not be used alone as a measure of free speech. The freedoms measured cover only the media, not individuals. Moreover the scoring method implies that a high score in one area offsets freedoms denied in another area.

Assumption: 

The views of IREX staff have a high weight in the index. Users therefore assume that IREX representatives are at least as knowledgeable as the panel of country experts. The norms used would imply that a sustainable media requires a functioning market economy. Advertising revenue and private sector paper producers are key factors, for example.

Example results: 

The table below shows all results of a selected country from the 2005 index.